Tuesday, November 24
Future Visions
Much of the discussion following the video's release hinged upon unbridled excitement - how this or that feature/update looks amazing, is unexpected, is exactly what a player was hoping for. Much of the discussion also focused on pragmatic analysis (or cynical doubt) of what features were most likely to actually reach the game, and which were unlikely to ever be delivered. Regardless, the sheer volume of excitement generated by this one video is, in my experience, unprecedented. People who were stuck in the endless cycle of the slow XP grind have come alive again with a passion for the game.
The general impression from most people is that if NCSoft is able to deliver even half of these upgrades and updates, the game will be completely reinvigorated. I am personally ecstatic about the inclusion of player housing, as it allows for a player to truly become a part of the world, to shape its landscape and become a part of the structure. I am shocked at the aparent inclusion of world defense PvP of these housing zones - this is unprecendented in my experience, and has me really excited. The idea of defending my own home, in addition to my homeland, from invasion and destruction, is fascinating and exciting.
From my own personal experience with NCSoft and their occasional underdelivering, I was able to identify a few points in the video that seem a bit far-fetched, but then again - it's possible that they've learned from their past mistakes and are looking to remedy unfulfilled promises from Linaege II in Aion.
Friday, October 16
Aion Launch Rewind
The Aion release went largely as expected. Server overload, population caps, log in queues that were no joke (they legitimately restricted the number on the servers at any time to minimize lag issues for those lucky enough to be in the game) and occasional crashes and downtimes. And of course, lots and lots of whining that it was "the worst MMO launch ever" from kids who clearly weren't around for the launch of WoW to see how poorly managed that was, even with its massive number of servers. The queue times sucked, but once you were in you were in, and it was (for the most part) playable.
For the first time ever I had very few problems with a new title - I had the game installed from the beta, and was able to play for a couple days without even needing to pick up my game. No technical issues until I attempted to upgrade my account to the Collector's Edition - that took about an hour's time during which it appeared my code had and had not been accepted simultaneously. Apart from that my only complaint was missing the first two nights of prime levelling time to go to a(n insanely awesome) Pearl Jam concert. Talk about bad timing!
It didn't take long for most of our predictions about Aion to come true. People started quitting the game in their late teens before ever hitting the PvP zones, or the early 20s before earning even half of their skills and equipping stigmas. The general complaints were that the game was "too hard" or the characters "didn't have enough skills" at level 20. It's not until the mid 30s that most characters really come into their own with a nice variety of skills.
It's a shame to see people forming bad opinions of the game (which they then spread) that are based on such a small portion of the gameplay. The first 20-25 levels are meant to serve as a tutorial in how to play your character, what the world is and why it is that way, and what your individual role is in the drama that's unfolding. All roads lead to level 25 and the abyss - the PvPvE zone that exists between the two worlds that comprise Atria. Though it's sad to see many people quit before ever seeing this zone and the future of the gameplay, it's not entirely unexpected, and the weak hearted will not be missed. After the first few weeks the server queues died down and now the servers appear to be well and evenly populated, thanks to NCSoft's careful control of character creation.
Thanks to the gameplay design, people are well entertained as they level. Characters are begining to peek over the level 40 mark, and explore exciting new areas. Forts are regularly conquered and lost, as are the artifacts surrounding them. Owning the forts allows each faction additional instances to be run once daily, which is excellent for experience and also for rewards. The first instance in the game is even structured like a fort, populated with Balaur, the game's third (NPC) faction. By taking each player through this dungeon with good xp and loot for rewards, the game also trains the players to know what to expect during a siege.
Wednesday, August 19
Social Games: Farmville on Facebook
Tuesday, August 18
The Guild Does It Again
Aion Closed Beta 4: Wrap-up Coming Soon
I'll be writing up some comments, observations, and concerns for the live release this week, as well as posting some amusing screenshots. Right now I'm still feeling the withdrawal, and not really looking forward to tonight's WoW raid.
Saturday, August 1
Ownership in MMORPGs
DAoC:
Dark Age of Camelot was my first MMORPG, and it will always hold a special elevated place in my heart for this. The art was nothing special - vast expanses of flat green or brown, planar trees, and a complete lack of interractable objects made for a static and uninteresting world. The gameplay was focused heavily on PvP combat - though players could level peacefully in their own lands for the majority of their advancement, "the frontier" was also available. In the frontier of each land you might encounter enemys from the other factions (there were 3 total, a brilliant though simplistic move meant to minimize the effect of population imbalance). There you also had strategic locations to defend - keeps. Each realm had several, perhaps 6 or so. Retaining these was imperative for the defense of the larger and heavily guarded relic keep. If enemy factions breached this keep and conquered your relics, you suffered penalties (and shame). For each relic held beyond one's own relic, there was a bonus granted. The posession of relics was meant to keep the PvP combat alive and flourishing, encouraging people to constantly conquer, defend, and recapture their keeps and those of their enemies.
A feature that Mythic added to the game relatively early on was the ability for a guild to "claim" a keep as their own. Once a guild claimed a keep, they were able to use their talents and resources to upgrade the fortifications, increase the guard patrols, and they also recieved custom messages whenever a patrolling guard was attacked. This ownership placed responsibility on the guild and its members, and also gave them respect if they were able to maintain control of their keep for lengthy periods of time. I still remember the pride I felt when my guild claimed one of the keeps the day this was implemented. It gave us a purpose, and created a hub of guild activity. We'd keep a few people in the area "just in case" as a quick response network, and we'd communicate with the keep owners nearby as a sort of "early warning" system whenever we were attacked. This ownership drew each player into the combat and defense system and allowed us to feel as though we were a part of the story of the world.
The second type of ownership that Mythic added to the game was player housing. To date I don't think I have ever anticipated any addition to an MMO as desperately as I anticpated this particular content patch. A player housing zone was added near each capital city, in which players could purchase a piece of land (10 or so lots per village, with clusters of villages in several zones) and then purchase several tiers of housing. Individual players tended to opt for the cottages (costing 1 platinum) or the house (5 platinum). The third and fourth tiers (villas and mansions) were very expensive (10 and 25 platinum), and generally limited to guilds or other groups of people. Each tier had certain ammenities, allowing for added convenience. You could purchase additional chests to store items in (and easily swap between characters, previously quite the hassle without in game mail), teleport or vendor NPCs, and crafting items such as a forge or a loom, so you could turn your home into a workshop. You were able to customize access to your home, restricting to self only, guild only, friend only, or enabling specific individuals. You could allow your entire guild in your home, but deny permission to use the NPCs, or allow some people to view but not deposit or withdraw from your bank.
I owned a home on each of my servers, and my home quickly became the focal point of my MMO universe. On my Hibernian server we had a strong alliance that held for many years, and the level of friendship between members in different guilds was quite high. Rather than populating villages by guild, we were mixed together a few from each guild in each village - friends and aquaintences alike living as neighbors and mixed guild banners flying side by side. I never particularly enjoyed the architectural style of the cottages, but I did love decorating my home and garden. My home on my Midgard server was another affair entirely - though I'm not much for the rugged viking style either I absolutely adored my large home. It was in the style of a hunting lodge, wooden and spacious inside. I decorated the interior with taxedermied animals I had hunted myself (kinda gross, but the trophy function was also a fun way to document your achievements). The purchase of a porch allowed each player to place an NPC outside the home that could sell crafted or aquired wares (searchable by a community bulletin board, much like the auction house function in WoW). This was a huge advancement from working purely on commission for all crafters. The cost of owning a small home was not prohibitive, and the rent could be paid either in money or in points earned through PvP, so all players had an option to cover their payments.
Lineage II:
Ownership in Lineage II was one of the primary PvP purposes of the game, implemented through castle sieges and battles over clan halls. It was also heavily leveraged in PvE, as all the raid bosses in the game were "world spawn", causing the entire server to fight in order to earn the right to kill and loot it. Not only did clans fight over the limited supply of clan halls (far fewer halls were available than needed to support the server population at the height of the game's popularity), but they fought over a limited number of castles as well. Castle ownership was more than a bragging point and display of power - owning a castle allowed players to control commerce in their region, levy taxes, and control a complicated manor system of harvesting materials that could quickly make the clan wealthy beyond belief. The wealth generated by some castles was indeed so great that the castle owner would buy the allegience of clans to fight in the castle's defense, or to avoid the sieges altogether.
Ownership in Lineage was not the private affair it was in DAoC - the clan halls were shared property as were the castles, and were meant as status symbols. The limited supply generated conflict and kept the politics of each server alive with treachery and backstabbing as each clan fought for a chance at the prize. This was not surprising since Lineage aimed to reward clans, rather than individuals. Until the hero system arrived, the only real means of gaining individual recognition was by becoming a respected crafter, notorious ganker, or the king of a castle (clan leader of the clan conquering a castle).
WoW:
Ownership in WoW does not extend to actual property or strategic points. Wintergrasp, the only PvP location that can be claimed by one faction over another, simply changes hands every few hours on a rotation - each side gets its turn. This makes the wait very short to gain access to the short PvE instance inside the zone, so there is no real incentive to hold onto ownership through zealous defense. Ownership exists also in the form of vanity items such as titles, tabards, and mounts that demonstrate particular achievements and are worn like a badge of pride, but these trinkets are not pieces of the world or tied into the flow of world events, and though some are very rare indeed, they do not have the same effect in my eyes. WoW has its little competitions and rare bonus prizes, but they are not necessary for success in the game. They are just trinkets and novelties - they are enjoyable but serve no real purpose.
I would argue that the implementation of battlegrounds killed what little sense of ownership did exist in WoW. Before BGs there was a good measure of world PvP, which was fun and fit with the world story. After BGs, however, world PvP shrunk to occasional ganking over world resources. People just queue up for BGs when they want to PvP, and world defense became a thing of the distant past. There is no "ownership" of your faction's towns, they just lie desolate and undefended from attack. This is a topic I will touch on extensively later - the way that instanced/rinse and repeat PvP killed WoW as a dynamic game. The world just became a vehicle for the PvE instances, arenas, and PvP battlegrounds. A place to farm and run the same dailies endlessly to make money.
Aion:
For Aion it's too soon to really tell, but it appears they have carried over the idea of castle ownership from Lineage II/DAoC as an incentive to particiate in the structured PvP. Collective ownership by your faction offers definite advantages for PvE content, making additional bosses and dungeons available.
World defense also becomes necessary in order for players to be able to level and farm in peace. Since a number of quests send you to the opposing faction's zones to complete objectives and harvest materials, there is likely to be a constant stream of people invading. This helps keep the game interesting - even while grinding out quests and farming to craft you might run into a few enemies or an entire raid. This forces everyone to pitch in to defend their territory, reinforcing the idea of territory ownership.
As for the rest, well time will tell if we get player housing (which would be awesome, but all the same is probably unlikely) or other things aimed at reinforcing the current game dynamic.
Friday, July 24
Aion Closed Beta 4 Announced
Missing the second CB meant I started out at a 20 level deficit that I have been unable to eradicate. That's ok though. I'm not intent on busting through the levels and burning myself out before the game releases - I plan on finishing my current zone, checking out the desert zone a little, and playing a child sized Elyos to experience their content a bit. Hopefully it will help me chose which faction to play.
I can't wait for next weekend!
Thursday, July 23
Hilarious WoW PvE Videos
Flame Leviathan - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azFo-Mlh3Fc&NR=1
Razorscale - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3lFKbVaPZw&NR=1
Auriaya - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elA3bFPLbd8
Hunter Q&A....
We want to resolve what a hunter is supposed to do in melee (Raptor Strike? Disengage?).
I can resolve that for them right now. The hunter never raptor strikes. Ever. You know when a hunter raptor strikes? When they tank Bloodboil in Black Temple and are forced to melee for 30 seconds with no other option. And even then most hunters just melee and watch their healthstones/healthpots/deterrence in a desperate effort not to die. Even before the launch of Burning Crusade there was only one time to ever bother with Raptor Strike - Thaddius in 40 man Naxx, if your tank failed at positioning him just right and you could not get out of your dead zone to shoot. Even in PvP the only useful melee skill a hunter posesses is counter-attack, which is not nearly worth the point spent, especially since it requires a parry or a dodge to trigger it...I really forget, since I haven't even bothered to train level 1 on my new hunter. Hunters do not melee. EVER.
The hunter is not a ranger, a hybrid, a melee character of any kind. They are a physical dps ranged class with a pet (regardless of the "magical" aspect to some attacks, they are still an archer). I sincerely hope Blizzard does not make the mistake this late in the game of redesigning the class to involve any melee skills whatsoever - if this was inteded to be a ranged/melee hybrid class then it should have been developed in that vein rather than with a pet. Oh wait,
I’ll add that the melee attack issue for hunters themselves is something we keep discussing. While we are unlikely to go back to a melee-focused build for hunters, we might consider a model where hunters don’t run away most of the time but switch to melee attacks – perhaps even a single punishing attack on a cooldown before the hunter Disengaged or whatever. This would be one of those things that helped hunters feel more different than actual magic casters, and might make them care about melee weapons as more than stat sticks.
I was confused about this "melee attack issue" until I read further to see the other community questions addressed. This reads like the laziest list ever - complaint after complaind regarding pet controls, survival, heals and resurection for pets. The heal issue was actually my favorite:
One suggestion made by many hunters was to add a passive ability that healed the hunter's pet when the hunter received a heal from a party or raid member.
I have an alternate suggestion. People who are too slow/bad/lazy to heal their own pet should not play a pet class. Pets already recieve pleanty of accidental healing from AoE heals, PoM and other passive regeneration skills. Proper management of pets, such as pulling them AWAY from whirlwinding mobs goes a long way to keeping a pet alive, as does healing it when you know unavoidable damage is incoming. Often, keeping your pet alive in PvE content is as simple as setting your pet on the melee target and setting yourself on the ranged target. Not hard. But then again these are the same people who complain it's too slow to resurrect your pet as BM spec - even though the cast timer goes down to 5 seconds or so.
Finally, the largest misstatement of the interview:
Now for hunters specifically, we think the class is just too cooldown limited,
which creates problems with haste.
This just made me laugh. Out loud. Hunters have many different shots, all of which share a global cooldown. We also have a large number of INSTANT shots - all stings (viper/serpent/scorpid), black arrow and explosive shot for survival, chimera shot and silencing shot for marksmanship, aimed shot and arcane shot for all specs. The only shots that have a cast time are multi-shot, steady shot, and the channeled volley. So perhaps when thinking about itemizing the hunter set gear Blizzard should take into account that haste is not a desired stat - it is equally useless to all. Haste would have been useful in the days of aimed shot spam, but this is the age of hunter instant shots with steady shot mixed in when nothing else is available. Haste is simply not beneficial to most of our skills. This has nothing at all to do with cooldowns. I prefer to play without cooldowns, and that is how it works for Survival spec - I hang onto my Rapid Fire for Bloodlust or favorable conditions, and then maximize my dps. As Marksmanship it's another story that involves on use trinkets, properly timing Rapid Fire, using Readiness to make Rapid Fire available again, and then reusing it again at the proper moment. So yes, I feel this build is restricted greatly by cooldowns and I don't enjoy playing it. But that has nothing to do with haste whatsoever. To make haste useful would require reworking hunter instant shots to include cast time, and would fundamentally redesign the class.
So to summarize. Nothing interesting in the pipe, nothing necessary being fixed (apart from the oft made "we're going to streamline the pet bar" promise and the teaser of maybe, possibly, perhaps in a few years you can tame more pets). And no real solid understanding of what real hunters want, just responses to the whining masses.
Full Text:
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/underdev/hunter.html
Sunday, July 12
The World vs. The Character: Meta and Micro Story in MMORPGs
The World of Warcraft approach to questing and game story has been to focus on the meta story - the world in peril, pushing back the never ending assault of the burning legion on the world of Azeroth. The micro story of each character suffers as a result. Though each character grows in strength and level, there is not much in terms of "character" development. You never "mature" from one class into another, and though you may attain titles and honors, there are no real "ceremonies" or acklowledgement within the game, aside from the odd congratulatory mail from NPCs. In this regard, WoW plays emphasizes the MMO aspect while minimizing the RPG - it sacrifices the small scale narrative and character growth of an RPG for the meta story and social gameplay. The real accomplishments of the game are collective: success in the PvP arena or Battleground system, or success with the 10-20-25-40 player raiding content.
There are small nods to a micro story - opening the dungeon Ahn Quiraj required the completion of a massive quest chain, at the end of which one character on each realm was able to finally break the seal and open the instance. In this instance, individual players were able to impact the world and interract on a "personal" level with the meta story. Other such quests have been since added in small quantity, most notably the zone-wide quest chain in Dragonblight for the Horde (there's some sort of Alliance counterpart, I'm sure) that culminates in the death of an Alliance and Horde Hero, the overthow of Sylvannas Windrunner, and the retaking of the Undercity. Even so, these quests that attempt to draw the player into the meta storyline do little beyond make the player feel like a witness to great events - not a participant. The gameplay video was a nice touch, as with the short one you encounter before Brutallus in the Sunwell. These small moments help to draw the character, and the player, into the world. Ultimately they fall flat due, in my opinion, to their infrequency - they tell little stories but ones that are largely unrelated and don't build on any sort of narrative or momentum.
It's no secret to anyone who has heard me talk at length about my feelings about WoW that I believe Blizzard blew a golden opportunity. Before the release of Burning Crusade, the game did make small efforts to develop characters. They were simplistic, but they did exist: class quests as you leveled, or epic weapon quests for some classes allowed the player to participate in a narrative that was specifically for them. With the release of Wrath of the Lich King, a move was made back in this direction for the Death Knight class. NPCs treat Death Knights with disgust, as does the general population before each individual character is accepted as a member of their faction. In this sense, the DK earns its place as a fighter of the Alliance or Horde. This type of character accomplishment has a strong role playing aspect to it, and manages to draw the character into the story. The starter DK quests are also well designed, taking the character through a number of linked objectives to prove their worth, though they ultimately reject domination by the Lich King and defect to their faction instead.
This type of interraction and questing could have made WoW into a truly phenomenal game. Unfortunately, the choice was made to bog the game down under hundreds and hundreds of quests unrelated to any greater objectives or to develop the feel of the world. "Go fetch" and "go kill" quests are just vehicles for free money and experiencem not storytelling. Players were resigned to grinding out these quests for miscelaneous rewards to gain wealth, rather than move a story point forward. The balance between narrative and practical advancement was lost. WotLK seems to attempt to right this imbalance, but the formula was already set. The excellent quest lines and the ability for quest completion to literally redesign the world (absolutely brilliant) become burried under all the bloated extra quests that simply exist to grant xp and useless items, guide players through each zone from quest hub to quest hub, and occupy player time. Every thing the game does right is countered by something the game does wrong, leaving it at a net standstill.
It's because of this "overburdening" of quests in WoW that I was nervous to hear that NCSoft had implemented a large number of quests in their forthcoming "Aion: The Tower of Eternity" MMORPG. Having experienced NCSoft's idea of quests in Lineage II, I was greatly alarmed. Quests in Lineage II were generally not story telling devices - instead, they were ways to maximize your use of time. Since you were going out to hunt anyway to regain experience you'd lost, or build up some materials and wealth to craft some new gear, you simply accepted a quest that would take you days or weeks to complete that you could inch forward on simultaneously.
There were also "character narrative" quest lines at level 20, 35, 37, and 39 that allowed you to develop your character into a more advanced and specialized class. At level 75 you completed an even more complex and complicated quest line to gain access to a new set of abilities. Beyond that there were additional complex questlines for becoming a noble character, a ranking that came with numerous privledges and special qualities. These types of quests were frustrating but made the player the agent of their character's development. They also punctuated the character's lifespan well, giving the players a feeling that their character was truly advancing periodically. The game did not have many quests, but still managed to draw the player/character into the world by the development of the character through the levels and - most notably - through server reputation. Being a game that focused almost entirely on world pvp and wars between individual players, each person was deeply tied to the other players through social and political actions.
The open pvp system forced players to constantly watch their backs, protect their friends, and build the strength of their clans, alliances, and relationships with other individual players and groups. This social/political structure was incredibly immersive and addictive, drawing players into server drama and making each person an integral part of the server. The "meta story" of Lineage 2 was not a world of NPCs in peril - it was a world entirely populated by players. The void of content actually served to increase the immersive qualities of the game. Player choices - alliances, wars, castle sieges - these drove the story of the world forward and each server was unique and told a different "story". There were servers on which people generally cooperated and worked together, sharing castles and collaborating to defeat the most difficult world spawn raid bosses. Then there were servers like mine (Kain) where massive wars were formed on a server-wide scale with kill zones, territorial lockdowns, and constant raids of the "enemy" territory. As a casual virtual social anthropologist it was an incredibly fascinating experiment in human nature. Given a blank slate, people responded with a terrific breadth of actions, from incredibly collaborative and supportive to aggressive, violent, or manipulative.
Saturday, July 11
Final Fantasy: Distant Worlds
Program: [updated to include video links from the Seattle performance]
Liberi Fatali (VIII)
To Zanarkand (X)
Don't Be Afraid (VIII)
Aerith's Theme (VII)
Medley FFI-FFIII
Dear Friends (V)
Vamo' alla Flamenco (IX)
Love Grows (Eyes on Me) (VIII)
Ronafaure (XI)
Main Theme (All)
Bombing Mission (VII)
Fisherman's Horizon (VIII)
Memoro de la Stono (XI)
The Man With the Machine Gun (VIII)
Theme of Love (IV) (skipped due to time constraints)
Swing de Chocobo (All)
The Opera - Maria and Draco (VI)
Terra's Theme (VI)
One Winged Angel (VII) (encore!)
First Complaint: The Accompanying Video
Most of the video footage was classic gameplay footage. Not movies, not opening cinematics. Not even later gameplay footage with acual expresssion and body language. A large amount of great game movie footage and CGI movie not used at all, and a the small amount that was used was actually reused. The "classic" style gameplay footage was hilarious and adorable at first, but though the novelty wore off quickly the footage persisted. Why use minutes and minutes of old school chocobos running across maps when you have pleanty of more dynamic footage from the more recent titles that shows the depth of the art and how the chocobo has evolved throughout the titles? For those of us who have been playing Final Fantasy for a long time it was nostalgic in small quantites, but it got old after a while. For those in the audience (mostly confused girlfriends) who haven't, it was just silly. The narratives and the art - what have always set Final Fantasy apart from the rest of console RPGs for me - were totally lost in the representation.
This was compounded by the fact that there was a heavy emphasis on early titles. The tribute to Final Fantasy I - III was great, especially since it featured some of the recently redone DS content which is beautiful. But the DS gameplay would have been preferable to the old style stuff. The FFVII gameplay was nostalgic for me since it was the first title I had access to, but after a little bit of it, they could have gone to the movie quality as well (towards the end they actually used the Advent Children footage, and it was AWESOME. If they had used the CG quality stuff throughout, the experience would've been so much more profound). The "cuteness" of the blocky avatars really drew me away from the power of the music. Terrible, terrible decision that undermined some of the strongest music of the night.
Beyond the poor choice of footage, it was constantly recycled. Really. Eleven console titles, one online title, 3 DS titles, plus additional FF stuff...and they couldn't find enough unique footage for a 2 hour symphony show? Unbelievable. For titles like 8 where a lot of footage was used, I was shocked to see none of the ballroom sequence "Waltz for the Moon", none of the very end movie, and almost none of the parade sequence. From FFVIII and onward the video sequences were really stunning, and yet there was not that much used (except, thankfully, quite a lot of Yuna's sending dance in one sequence). From FFX onward the gameplay footage is excellent too. Even as early as VIII it's possible to glean emotion from the characters in play mode, but instead of using the footage to tell a story to accompany the music, it was really just a distraction. If the video is not telling a story, then static art images would have been far superior.
Opening videos tell stories! Stories are good!
Final Fantasy III
Final Fantasy IV
Final Fantasy VIII
Final Fantasy IX
Final Fantasy XII
Second Complaint: No Music From FFXII
NONE. Far and away FFXII is my favorite title. Best and most well rounded cast, best story in terms of complexity and flow, best writing, best language, best voice actors, best art....and an amazing score of music that was completely ignored for this performance. I could have done without any of the FFXI music, period. I found it to be the dullest, though at the very least the choice of video for the FFXI segments told a story. And the true loss was the gorgeous movies and expressive gameplay. There were just a few tiny, tiny clips of the wedding scene.
I'm hoping that they'll add FFXII in the future, since aparently the addition of FFXI was relatively new. Even the small bits were amazing, like the resting music! Seriously...they could tour on this alone...
Full Collection of FFXII Music on YouTube
Full Collection of FFXII Movies and Cutscenes on YouTube
Some Examples:
Final Fantasy Theme (opening credits)
Symphonic Poem Hope (end credits)
Time for a Rest (inn music)
To The Place of the Gods
The Forgotten Capital
Theme of the Empire
The Battle for Freedom
State of Emergency
Seeking Power
An Imminent Threat
Rebellion
Final Thoughts
The FF Series of games are not hard, tricky, or complicated to play. They're really just beautiful interactive stories. That's what this concert series missed and could have capitalized on. There were moments here and there where a certain clip reminded me about what it was I loved about an earlier title that I haven't played in some time. This series had the opportunity to take us back, walk us through the story and retell in a few minutes' time the dramatic and often tragic sweep of each game's narrative. I really feel a better presentation format might be to take each title, chronologically, and present its music. Leading off with the Main Theme, and moving through each title - starting with the I-III medly. For some of the games, which have a lot of music, you would have a large chunk of time to string together footage to tell a comprehensive story.
I hope that as this event continues to tour and hopefully prepares for tours in the future they take this into account. And I hope I can get "To Zanarkand" out of my head before I go completely insane.
Tuesday, July 7
Aion Closed Beta 3: Asmodian 1-20
Compare (click for larger image):
Left: Elyos starting zone. Intact buildings, warm colors, lots of trees and flowers.
Right: Asmodian starting zone. Shattered buildings (same as the intact ones for Elyos) and tents, cool colors, different types of foliage.
As for the hunting - at first I was underwhelmed by the variety of mobs to hunt. The models they do have are pretty nice - birds, beasts, and some humanoids. But as I flew over the world from one town to another (a very fast endeavor compared to WoW - the flight points were short and flight speed was very quick) I realized how small the world actually is, compared to World of Warcraft. Rather than a flight point on a mount, you are given beautiful magic wings and you zoom over the terrain. I began to evaluate the size and structure of the world and made a couple of awesome discoveries about how the world's structure impacts the gameplay.
This allows for the second quality: a fluidly designed world that is both small and large simultaneously. In WoW, flying from one corner of a continent to another can take quite a lot of time, as can navigating through a zone (especially at the lower levels). Aion is smaller, and uses the channels instead of vast expanses of wasted space to give people room to exist. An additional benefit is that the smaller size of the world allows for it to feel more dynamic and detailed. For the most part MMO's trade in flat spaces in their effort to balance the realism of a dynamic physical world and a practical maneuverable one. Aion, with instant flight and the ability to glide even in "flight free" zones gets around this general rule. The world that I have seen thus far has been incredibly detailed, but also varried in terrain which gives it a nice realistic sense.
Wednesday, July 1
LAN for SC2 Petition
I was the 24,567th person, too.
please do not castrate this game by forcing the burden of a dedicated
internet connection as an absolute necessity for gameplay. though the majority
of play does and will happen on battlenet, the flexibility of LAN play greatly
enhances gameplay and encourages people to network and have LAN parties. please do not remove this bridge between the virtual and visceral community of SC players.
Tuesday, June 30
No LAN for Starcraft 2
Perhaps I should be saying "thanks" instead since I'll never again have to lug a PC to someone else's place and go through the hassle of networking just to get raped by zerglings.
Monday, June 29
More Blizzard Pandering to the Masses
WoW Faction Changes
I think I hear the death of what little integrity was left in the WoW universe. There's really no way to fit this into the game narrative.
I Can't Resist
PS3, check
Little Big Planet, check
Wall-E, check
I'm not sure I can pass this one up....
Must keep reminding myself: not backwards compatible, not backwards compatible, not backwards compatible.
What good is a PS3 if I can't roll the world up into little balls? In fact, I think I will go listen to some Katamari music to reaffirm my willpower to resist this offer!
Wednesday, June 24
Agency and Choice in MMORPGs
Class change, subclass, noblesse, and other "mandatory" quest lines in Lineage II were, in a word, arduous. Part of me misses that, the concept of working so hard for something, because that so greatly magnifies the elation you feel upon completion. In fact, for some reason I am recalling my very first level 20 class change quest, and the line up in the hallway as all the players who needed to complete a certain step waited for the one quest monster to respawn. We all sat there, waiting in queue, behind a little line of adena (money) on the ground. As each player succeeded, there was a miniature celebration, and then we all moved along to the next phase. If we'd only known what was in store for us at 35, 37 and 39 for those quest lines!
The level 10 "getting your wings" questlines seems pretty simple and straightforward, which is probably an indicator of the game's decreased difficulty (a mixed blessing). I like that they distinguish between these two types of quest so clearly - I think it paves the way for a very rich quest system, which is further enhanced by actual cutscenes even for early, low level quests. WoW drops the player in the world with a small video, and then ushers you through 80 levels of rinse and repeat quests for rewards, with a bit of storytelling mixed in - the long quest lines are more explicative than interractive, done for rewards rather than exploring the world. It's not until WoTLK that you actually begin to feel a part of the "grand history" told in the Warcraft cannon.
Not only are there "cut scenes" in which your character (not your faction, but your actual individual self) is "placed" into the global conflict and explained, but it appears as though the developers might be setting the game up for actual choices. From the progression of the quest dialogues, it's possible that players might be able to chose from multiple responses while progressing through a questline. I wish I had proper screenshots to demonstrate, but the window in which the NPC converses with your character doesn't contain a "next" or "complete quest" button. Instead, you click on a "link" of text that is a response. It triggers reactions - more dialogue, emotes, cutscenes. Even if there is but one option for the quest to progress forward, the player still "incites" the event that follows.
This leads me to the previously advertised interesting topic: agency and decision making in games. This system feels as though it posesses the room to grow into a decision tree system, where players may actually make choices at certain points along a quest line. Don't like an NPC's request? Instead of not taking the quest, deny him. Does this change your reputation? Do other quests become available to you for refusing him? There was a bit of discussion raised when WoTLK had quests that involved torture (yet stealing babies for other quests is ok. in fact it's so ok that it's a daily!) - what if they offered you the choice to take a moral stand against it rather than use it to get information? Lineage II had one step in that direction with class change quests, allowing players to turn their "generally skilled" character into one of several types of "specifically skilled" classes, with no ability to change. Instead of popping into the world "fully formed" and following one possible path, you had options - paths that diverged and never reconnected, and affected every second of gameplay. Your decision made all the difference.
Speaking strictly as an enthusiast and not as a scholar, role playing games always follow a set course. The character and plot develop, typically following a traditional narrative framework that builds towards a final conflict of some sort, usually with an epilogue, There are occasionally small choices made by the player in an RPG that may have small impacts on the story (I think of the Final Fantasy VII example, where how you respond to the female characters throughout the game leads directly to which goes on a date with the protagonist, and also to the player's ability to "skip" encountering optional characters that are available to join the party). These nearly always fall under the category of "sidequests" and do not actively influence the game's progression and are completed out of a desire for "complete" or "perfect" games.
MMOs break from this lack of agency by allowing players to craft their own social experience of the game. While the "global plot" is contrived by the game developers, players drive the daily in-game experience. In World of Warcraft, for example, the quests progress from A to B to C along a linear path, as do the raid instances - kill boss A to access boss B, kill boss B to access boss C. There is often some wiggle room, but chosing to complete one wing of a dungeon before another, or which quest to complete first when one does not hinge on the other has no impact on the content of the game, merely its experienced order. The few and far between instances of actual choices impacting gameplay in WoW tend to come in the form of faction allignment - in the Burning Crusade players chose to ally with either the Scryer or Aldor faction and thus became hated by the other. But these factions were essentially "equivalents" so the choice was just window dressing. The same can be said for the choice between Frenzyheart and Oracle factions in Wrath of the Lich King - there is no real difference between them except that each faction offers different vanity items. And as with the Scryer and Aldor factions, a player is free to switch at any time (though the process of "leveing up" the reputation is time consuming) so it does not constitute a serious "life" decision that cannot be altered. In Lineage II players could chose which to fight for the forces of Dawn or Dusk every time the new cycle came up (it was bi-weekly or so, one week to compete, one week to benefit from victory).
In tabletop RPGs, which I admit to never playing, the direction of the game is at the mercy of the dungeon master, but the individual actions and decisions are up to each player. That type of responsibility requires players to be creative (as it's open ended) and engaged with the game and its content. RPGs and MMORPGs lack this quality - they are so caught up in mechanics and repetition that players have virtually no capacity to influence the story of the game, they are simply along for the ride. Lineage II managed to avoid this by turning the PvE (player vs enemy -- monster slaying) into a boring, repetetive device that was simply a tool for the actual content of the game -- the PvP (player vs player) combat and server politics. There was no "end game" content for Lineage. You didn't progress through one dungeon after the next as you do in WoW, replacing your tier 5 with tier 6, your tier 6 with tier 7 - linear, predictable progression. Instead, there were places to level, resources to collect, wealth to amass, and a world to dominate. The conflict between players was perpetual, and drove everything forward like a real world in miniature. The alliances and wars drove the economy and politics forward in an endless and unpredictable cycle. I hope that this possibly open quest system (fingers crossed!) might instill some of the same chaos and unpredictablilty to Aion that made Lineage so exciting to play. But there's a reason games shy away from that type of model -- it's definitely somewhere between difficult to impossible to pull off, so we'll see if Aion tries to make that leap into the abyss.
Sunday, June 21
Aion Closed Beta 1: First Thoughts
I thought I would finally sit down and write up a little bit about the first Aion Closed Beta event in NA since I was a jackass and missed the second one that apparently everyone was playing together *grumble*.
For starters (and not surprisingly at all after seeing screenshots and playing at PAX) I spent a very large portion of time creating characters. This was also my chief form of entertainment when I stalked out a place (repeatedly) at the NCSoft booth at Pax 2008. I just can't get enough of the excellent graphics and level of customization. The first closed beta event opened up the first zone and 10 levels for the Elyos faction, who closely resemble humans and light elves from Lineage II. The girls are, of course, absolutely adorable. The male characters aren't that bad either. I was torn between making a cutie with freckles and messy hair or a hottie with a more polished look. In the end I settled for a girl who closely resembled a black haired Ashe from FFXII. My humorous aside note on this point is that in the second closed beta Jake managed to create an Asmodian Spiritmaster who looked quite like my Elyos Priest. What were the odds!
There's been quite a lot of discussion regarding the character creation so I'm not going to go into it very deeply, especially since the screenshots I thought I took of my harem of characters are missing. All that really needs to be said is that the characters you can create are unbelievably diverse and lifelike. As an extension to this, character emotes and idle animations are also unbelievably, well, animated. Facial expressions, reaction to weather and environment, and even "hawking your wares" as a personal shop (no more sitting on the ground, you get a stool now!).
I spent Friday night installing the beta and was only able to play for a few hours on Saturday, and I was still blown away by the level of detail in the environment and the obvious attention to each character action, whether it's talking to an NPC, setting up shop, or exploring the world.
It was most interesting to me to see how the game fused NCSoft's artistic style and gameplay with elements adopted from World of Warcraft. I have always and will always believe that Lineage II is a superior game to WoW (but that's a topic for another day) but there are many clever elements WoW introduced to make the game accessible and enjoyable to play. I was pleased to see Aion encorporates many of them.
Primary among the new features: a quest log (it looks better than the WoW quest log at first glance, with 2 seperate tabs to keep "questline" and "random" quests apart), an actual graphic interface (more minimal and aesthetically pleasing than WoW's and reminiscent of Diablo II, at least to me), in game mail, and the ability to jump and move fluidly with the keyboard. The NCSoft style is still heavy though (and it's mostly a good thing from what little I saw): point and click motion remains, everything costs money (even "binding" yourself to a location), and you train by buying books. As different as it looks from Lineage (the colors, oh my god...everything is just so detailed and colorful! Lineage had a fantasy mixed with realism art style, this is pure fantasy) I could immediately feel myself back in an NCSoft game. As dorky as it sounds, it felt like a homecoming.
I'll post some thoughts about questing later. For now I'm just going to smile and watch more gameplay vids and wait for closed beta 3.
Thursday, June 18
Today in In-Game Advertising
Yes, you can go just once to get your pet. But if you wish to "fuel" your pet, then you need to return daily.
Evil genius.
Monday, June 8
Super Mario Bros vs Conan!
Conan's new set with Super Mario Bros. overlay
Thursday, June 4
WoW Comics: Random DL Comics
I love this comic because it pretty simply encapsulates the feeling of a new expansion pack or massive content update. Everything else just stops mattering and the need to power through the content is overwhelming.
Must Level!
This one is also hilarious. The ridiculously high item values on greens in BC meant that a lot of people replaced low level raiding gear in their early 60s with hideous mismatched crap. Thankfully this was slightly retuned for Wrath of the Lich King, and the armor was all pretty much one skin set so as you made the transition from an epic gear set to a green or blue one, you wound up matching pretty well.
Quality Gear
In Game Product Placement
Don't believe me? Read more.
Game Stop and Sims 3
1) pushy sales clerk who I tried to avoid in the incredibly small store
2) he was the only person on staff, so when the 10 year old ahead of me at the register started asking questions I had to wait. And wait. And wait. This kid bit on everything "do you want to buy a strategy guide? 10% off." "Would you like to order? E3 just happened so there's lots to preorder."
3) The highlight of it all was when the kid asked what was available to pre order, and the clerk started listing other Blizzard games (the kid was buying a game pad to play WoW with, which made me cringe pleanty). When the clerk semi excitedly (the guy was practically comatose) said "you can preorder Starcraft 2" the kid actually said "Star Craft? what's that?" and his mom actually asked "you mean Star Wars?" so in an effort to speed things along I chimed in that "it was an RTS game released before you were born by Blizzard." Kid has probably never heard of Diablo either.
4) Anyway, kid and mom finally finished their business, and I got to buy my copy of Sims 3, which aparently I was getting the LAST copy of, because they gave me the damn display copy. I really hate when they do that.
5) Feeling the need to defend myself from the clerk's "you're buying a shitty game and you're a chick therefore you are a fake gamer" look, I wound up chatting about Blizzard games. After I said I played WoW he asked me the dumbest question ever: "what level". SERIOUSLY. WHAT LEVEL. The 10 year old kid probably has 3 level 80 characters. It was the most insulting question I've been asked in a long time. So I said 80 and he asked a less insulting question: Horde or Alliance, to which I replied both. Then he asked what class and I told him I played a hunter since the open beta and he finally shut up. Before asking me if I wanted to preorder any games, because E3 just happened and games like Starcraft 2 are now available for pre order. SERIOUSLY.
/facepalm
Tuesday, June 2
Obsessive Much?
Aion Beta!
I'm a little excited. And jittery. Now I regret skipping lunch...
Aion Aion Aion!
Monday, June 1
WoW Comics: Pets, Holidays and Achievements Edition
Pets and Orphans, Unite!
Achievements!
Loremaster
Through The Looking Glass - I love how DLC comics often have the perspective of NPCs, humanizing the game mechanics to point out how rude or dismissive most players are.
WoW Comics: Favorite Old School Comics
Rogue DPS Meters
Rogue Threat Meters
WoW Comics: Dark Legacy on Suspended Disbelief
For example, high level NPCs asking you to go pick some flowers or recover some tablets that they could easily enough obtain themselves, multiple players performing the same quests making your labor effectively unnecessary, and dailies - complete and recomplete the same quest every day (some newer dailies actually poke fun at this in the quest dialogue, too) are all instances that require suspension of disbelief. These are commonplace in RPG video games, and the gamer "agrees" to look the other way and simply accept the structure of the game as an ends to whatever means - gaining money, items, or experience.
But this "suspended disbelief" is a part of any game because it effectively asks you to forget the repetitive nature of gameplay (especially in "rinse and repeat" type games such as the Diablo franchise, where players bounce between games to clear a certain level repeatedly). It floats beneath the surface of every exchange and interraction, and is easy comic fodder because even gamers not versed in game theory can recognize that this agreement between game designer and consumer occurs.
Instead of turning a blind eye to the repetition of questing, the first comic turns the tables, and sees a new possibility for gathering wealth! The rest are semi related instances of quest humor based around repetition and multiple players.
Entrepreneurial Gnome
Stupid Quest Mechanics
Questing
Quest Drops - I also ask myself often "how come I get one spider leg off a spider (some of the time), shouldn't I be able to get up to 8 from each?"
Relearning talents probably would have consequences. Brain wipe!
Ouchies
Also, suspending disbelief when science fiction meets fantasy.
Dranei Invasion!
Data mining:
Wowhead + Armory
Finally, arbitrary reputation/faction interractions. Thankfully there are fewer factions in WotLK than there were in BC, and the reputation grind is generally less restrictive.
Rep Up!
Saturday, May 23
WoW Comics: So Me That It Hurts
Wednesday, May 20
WoW Comics: Dark Legacy's Valentines
Friday, May 15
Critter Glitter!
Wednesday, May 13
Server Downtime


Tuesday, May 12
Server Downtime
It's really a shame - I lost at least a thousand L2 screenshots over the years as my old computers blew up on me, and I never bother to take screenshots in WoW since the game isn't beautiful like Lineage.
I did manage to find the shot below, though, from our very first ever successful bear run!

Monday, May 11
Spring UI Cleaning: Mission Complete!
But, now that I have finally sat down and fixed everything up (except for my damn minimap, which has resisted all the addons I threw at it) I am much happier. I even went one step further than I have ever gone before in customizing my interface - I moved my self and pet portraits down to the bottom of the screen, directly above my chat box. Now I can monitor my health and chat without moving my eyes, YAY. Not sure if this bit will stick or not. I'm having a hard enough time getting used to having my target and target of target boxes at the bottom of the screen. It's convenient in that I can monitor whatever I'm healing or killing without looking away from my skill bars or too far from my own character, but it's inconvenient in that I keep SHOOTING SHEEP because I can't see my target as well when i'm selecting targets without assisting someone off a main tank list...
Ideally, all these changes will begin to feel normal soon and I will stop fumbling around trying to find everything. I'm pleased that I managed to fit nearly every hunter skill neatly on the screen (minus a few melee skills - lawl raptor strike - and unused aspects) as well as a small variety of mounts and vanity pets!
A streamlined but informative UI is one of the most important parts of an MMO. Lineage II managed to master the art of the minimal interface, forcing all users to make due with the same skeleton interface. It was awful, but equally awful for everyone. Unless you used mods (banable offense) that told you the hp/mana/level/location of players every player had the exact same amount of information on every other - even if you were in the same party. There was a small sliver of extra information available to "trusted players" such as the clan listing a character's level. Otherwise, every interface provided the exact same information - there was nothing extra to be squeezed out of the game and displayed to players so there was no need for things like recount. Fortunately, the interface for Aion seems to have taken some much needed cues from WoW's in terms of layout and design - whether customization will follow or not remains to be seen (aside note: I want my beta key now).
I'll definitely be revisiting the topic of interfaces when I finally manage to weasel my way into Aion. I might even have to dig up some old footage/screenshots of older games to really make a broad analysis of the differences. After all, my ultimate passion will always be semantics and semiotics. MMO's are virtual worlds where every pixel is created for a reason. Every symbol and sign communicates buckets of knowledge to those who can interpret it, making each gamer into an unknowing semiotician. My last treatise on the topic ran a whopping 64 pages (hey, there were pictures too) and was for a research methods course for my master's degree. Hopefully I'll be able to speak more succinctly on the topic when speaking for an initiated audience (nothing like having to explain what a "mana bar" is to a bunch of professors...).
Pearl Jam Rocks!

Reading that Rock Band will have a Pearl Jam track pack with its setlist voted entirely by fans was a great way to start my Monday! Now if they only manage to include my favorites...it's such a long list. Here's hoping tracks like Red Mosquito and Do The Evolution sneak in among the concert/fan staples like Given to Fly, Corduroy, Rearviewmirror, et al. There's such an amazing breadth of songs that it's tough to imagine any setlist doing the band justice. Perhaps we'll be lucky enough to see a setlist the length of a PJ show....3 hours worth of music! It will also be interesting to see if covers are included - PJ's versions of Rockin in the Free World (Neil Young), Fortunate Son (CCR), Baba O'Riley (The Who), and a whole load of other songs would be awesome additions if they can get permission. The song I would most like to hear is PJ's "Little Wing" cover (video here, from Georgia video here from Washington - with added bonus Star Spangled Banner). I like it better than the Hendrix original (/ducks) or the Stevie Ray Vaughn and Eric Clapton covers.
For the record, I recently made a casual "rough estimate count" of the number of Pearl Jam songs, and the tally (before cover songs of which there are dozens) of album tracks exceeded 100. I included b-sides and soundtrack songs (studio recorded) that were played live and did not include all of the fan club Christmas singles, so the tally really is a rough estimate.
http://www.joystiq.com/2009/05/11/pearl-jam-returns-in-new-rock-band-project-with-fan-voted-set/
Friday, May 8
Thursday, May 7
Best Messy Boss Kill Ever
/profit!
The Tuesday raid was pretty awesome as well, clearing out 2 full areas and all the Keepers except Mimiron. Zoom!